Back in August I wrote a post on blockchain-based ICOs and tokens/coins for the telecoms space (link). Quite a lot has happened since then — including a huge boom in Bitcoin and “AltCoin” valuations and public awareness — so I thought an update was useful.
In a nutshell — there’s a growing number of telecom/networking “coins” available, with a wide variety of concepts, team backgrounds and business models. Some are very interesting, but some others are… let’s say, “ambitious”. And a few look like utter nonsense, seemingly lacking understanding of the relevant technology or marketplace dynamics. It’s possible there’s a couple of outright scams as well.
I’m not making recommendations, or giving warnings, about specific tokens here. But in the spirit of “caveat emptor”, I also give a list of cautions and possible problems, that investors should think about, or ask the various currencies’ teams. Telecoms is a lot more complex than many people think — especially the “behind the scenes” bits of technology.
Note: If you’ve found this post via an ICO/cryptocurrency site, an introduction: I’m primarily a mobile and telecoms analyst. I advise on technology and business-model trends for networks and communications, eg 5G, IoT systems, Wi-Fi, voice & video & UC, regulatory policy, the future role of carriers/CSPs, and the impact of “futures” innovations like AI / ML, blockchains (public & private), quantum computing and drones on telecoms. Most of my clients are telcos or network equipment/software vendors. I’m not a fintech, crypto or blockchain generalist — I look at blockchains & tokens where they intersect with the telecom world. Please get in touch if you are interested in my research & advisory work, or if you are looking for a keynote speaker or moderator.
What’s been happening with telecom cryptocurrencies?
I’m not going to repeat my previous posts on ICOs, tokens and the wider telecom blockchain space. You can read blog posts here and here, or download a full white paper I wrote for Juniper Networks, here and listen to an associated webinar here.
The second half of 2017 saw continued emphasis on private blockchain use-cases for telecoms and networks, although despite a few high-ish profile initiatives and press releases, there’s not much in the “real world” yet besides pilots. I’ve been doing some interesting consulting work in this area, though — 2018 should throw up a lot more news.
But there has been far more noise — albeit often superficial — about public blockchain and token technologies. Few major telcos have (publicly) announced involvement, but there’s growing attention from the type of smaller, competitive types of service provider. Think tier 2/3 MVNOs, travel-SIM providers, VoIP companies, messenger & mobile advertising providers and so on, rather than big carriers. [Telenor is working with a content-oriented token provider — link]
Obviously, that fits against a wider background of interest and investment in cryptocurrencies. Whether we’re witnessing the birth of a new financial/transactional system, or a possible bubble, I’ll leave for others to debate. To me, it looks a bit like 1995 — lots of innovative web companies, but also a lot of ridiculous concepts, with valuations to match. Which are the Amazons of the future — or the Altavistas, or the pets.com’s — I’ll leave to others to work out.
There has also been a corresponding rise in regulatory concern, and growing focus on so-called “utility tokens”, where in theory a given coin isn’t just a store of value or a payment mechanism, but has some underlying property that makes it of broader use to consumers or businesses. Typically this means that some other capability can be “tokenised” — which could be anything from property to an artist’s work, and used within that business activity.
Incidentally — one interesting comms-related trend that’s appeared recently is the use of Telegram* (and some other group-messaging apps) as a mobile-friendly and anonymous/encrypted discussion & announcement forum for cryptocurrency teams. Many of the tokens use Telegram as an addition to public (often spam-infested) chat on Twitter, and private internal Slack channels, plus assorted blogging and forum tools. I haven’t seen any with an RCS messenger link, obviously.
*EDIT: Telegram has just announced its *own* ICO plans, literally hours after I posted this. Details here (link)
What telecoms/networking tokens are available?
A growing number of tokens relate to things which look “telecoms-like” — whether that’s data connectivity provided via cellular or WiFi, SMS or instant-messenger functions, voice-call minutes, SIM identities or something else similar.
Some are trying to resell existing users’ quotas or attention or connectivity, while others are trying to build new hardware platforms. Some are trying to create meshes or secure peer-to-peer connectivity, while others are looking to be wholesale marketplaces for service providers to offer smart-contracts to consumers (or other SPs).
(There’s also another huge set of tokens for IoT-related functions and applications, but I’ll consider those another time).
Note: I’m using token, coin, cryptocurrency, altcoin etc interchangeably. Various people will assert differences vigorously, but it’s not something that is relevant here.
Note 2: This is being written on 7th January 2018, so dates / funding & issuance status are accurate as of today, but obviously changing at a rapid pace.
Note 3: I am NOT making any recommendations by mentions here. Various ICOs and tokens have been of questionable quality, valuations are volatile & sometimes ridiculous, and some are rumoured to be outright scams. Be extremely careful.
Note 4: I’ve probably missed some out. Get in touch if you want to tell me about your telecom/network coin, or give me a detailed briefing on the ones below.
- Airfox, Airtoken $AIR (link): Attempts to draw a link between mobile prepay credits, advertising, user-data and potentially micro-loans in future. It extends the current model of gifting or sending “recharges” to many international mobile operators’ prepay customers, by shifting from normal payments to a cryptocurrency bought in a marketplace or earned by viewing ads.
- Althea (link): Aiming to build a network of WiFi and other wireless networks, underpinned by cryptocurrency micropayments and incentives. Recently decided against an ICO, in favour of being “cryptocurrency neutral” — see blog here
- Ammbr [DISCLOSURE: I am an advisor], Ammbr, $AMR (link). Private investor funded, but tokens being listed on exchanges soon. Developing a hardware mesh networking system [Wi-Fi & other technologies], linked to blockchain-based micropayment and self-sovereign identity platform. Aiming first at locations with “unconnected” or poorly-connected communities, but with broader applicability.
- Birdchain, $BIRD (link): Pre-ICO. Developing a messaging app & platform for users to re-sell their SMS allocation for application-to-person messaging
- Blocknum, $GIGA token (link) Token sale currently occuring. Looking at using the telephone network (PSTN), SIP signalling [used for VoIP] and phone numbers as a basis for a new blockchain for transactions.
- Bubbletone, Universal Mobile Token, $UMT (link). Currently doing pre-sale before ICO. Intending to be a marketplace for MNOs/MVNOs to publish data-plans or content services as smart contracts, with the plans/identities pushed down to users via multi-IMSI SIM cards, or as eSIM profiles. Aims to remove premiums for roaming.
- Crypvisr, $CVN (link): ICO in 2017, listing on exchanges due soon. Encrypted messaging/communications platform, aimed at both consumers and enterprises.
- DENT Wireless Dent-coin, $DNT (link). Platform for mobile data plan & allowance purchase and sale. Aiming to remove roaming fees. Early app version is live.
- EncryptoTel, $ETT (link): Token-based enterprise “cloud PBX” communications system.
- Mobilink, Mobi-Coins $MOBI (link). Upcoming ICO. Attempting to create an ad-funded mobile voice and data service, with a custom SIM card and network of MNO/MVNO relationships.
- Mysterium, $MYST, (link) Decentralised VPN aiming to allow people to share unused network capacity, and use encryption to reduce the risk of intrusive data analytics of Internet usage by ISPs. It’s a bit similar to Tor, but more flexible
- Qlink, $QLC (link): Token sale ongoing. Platform for sharing & micropayments for a variety of telco “assets”, starting with WiFi access & then aiming for cellular data, SMS and content. Also planning own access points, including LTE-U unlicenced cellular.
- Rightmesh, $MESH (link): Upcoming ICO. Creating an incentivised device-to-device mesh (WiFi, Bluetooth etc). The company operating it (called Left.io) also offers another device-to-device communications/sharing app called Yo.
- Smartmesh, $SMT (link) Tokenised device-to-device mesh based on WiFi, Bluetooth LE etc., starting with smartphones connecting via an incentivised peer-to-peer mechanism.
- SMSChain, $SMSTO, (link): Creating a decentralised SMS gateway for application-to-person text messages. Incentivises users to donate their unused SMS quotas, via a mobile app. Cancelled proposed ICO (link) & may list tokens on exchanges at later date.
- Telcoin, $TEL, (link): Payment/money-transmission token intended to be distributed through existing mobile operators, and aggregators.
- Telegram, Grams: [Added as this emerged shortly after I published this — see link] The messenger app is considering a huge ICO and token sale, which could allow it to embrace payments and money-transfer, and perhaps other applications to become a cryptocurrency-enriched competitor to WeChat and FB Messenger.
What could possibly go wrong? A lot.
A lot of my work as an analyst and consultant involves “stress-testing” ideas and business-plans. Many concepts sound interesting, but face challenges of practicality — whether that’s technical, commercial, legal or other. Reading through a lot of the tokens’ documentation, or speaking to project teams, I see a lot of aspirations that are going to bang heads against reality.
Some problems can be fixed with time, or clever developers. Others are going to be intractable, and will need workarounds, or completely different strategies.
In this post, I’m not offering opinions or reviews of individual tokens, although I have private opinions on a number of them. A lot of what I read could be best described as “aspirational” — and in some cases, there are many layers of complexity or problems ahead, and I anticipate pivots and revised expectations, as practical issues come to light. Some that I’ve seen look completely naive or muddle-headed (or even, whisper it, fraudulent).
Some of the issues that could derail the various tokens’ opportunity and prospects include:
- Most existing telecom plans (fixed and mobile) have terms and conditions that prohibit resale of “unused capacity” — and are likely to be updated with new token-proof T’s & C’s if risks are seen.
- Most MVNOs will also have a range of limitations in their contracts, from their host MNOs.
- Security — everything new comes with its own novel risks, even if the blockchain itself is secure. For instance, would you fancy having your 2FA password codes sent via SMS, that transits some random person’s phone and app?
- Nobody likes paying for stuff (even micropayments) if it’s also available for free via a different path. That means that there will be a lot of arbitrage — for example, it’s hard to compete against free WiFi, or against the newer “roam like home” packages.
- Nobody likes paying for stuff in a “currency” that changes in value compared to normal money. I don’t want to use some sort of converter to know how many pennies it’ll cost for a phone call or Wi-Fi connection.
- There’s all sorts of regulatory horribleness around telcos, at national, regional and global levels. Trying to assert “it’s all decentralised, we don’t need to follow the rules” won’t work if it involves licensed spectrum, or messing with legal rules on registering network users’ identities, lawful intercept etc.
- Running anything blockchain-related on a smartphone uses power & battery — especially if it needs to keep radio connections active as well. Power-management is always a challenge.
- Traditional telecom networks have complex operational and billing software. While some is too-inflexible and very expensive, most is a necessary evil to deal with performance management, customer service, creating innovative plans, deal with inter-party revenue-sharing and so on. In a decentralised world, how do you query charges, or call when something fails? How can you watch for problems emerging? (And who watches?)
- The hard part of getting data connections working is often “backhaul”, linking a base station or WiFi access point to the main Internet, especially from remote areas. It’s quite hard to tokenise digging up roads to install fibres.
- Slow deployment of eSIM-capable devices & back-end infrastructure, and willingness of carriers to offer remotely-provisioned “profiles” to third parties.
- Private cellular networks (even in unlicensed / shared spectrum) need core-network software and numerous other “moving parts”. Deploying LTE-U isn’t like buying a Wi-Fi access point from a store & setting it up.
- A lot of existing consumer Wi-Fi access points are provided by cable operators & broadband telcos, and integrated with a modem/router. Most people won’t want to replace them, or daisy-chain a second device, or re-flash the hardware. Business Wi-Fi systems are usually locked-down by IT departments.
- Anything using a mobile app for control, mining, transaction or advertising is at the whim of Apple’s AppStore rules, and to a lesser degree Google’s. They also need to deal with updates to features in new versions of iOS and Android, which may break things, or compete with them.
- All of the various parallel schemes will need to inter-work with each other at some point, if they’re successful.
- Adding extra latency because of extra network hops (or worse, payment negotiations) is going to be a lousy user-experience.
- The Internet and telecoms are very bi-directional. Do packets (or SMSs or calls) in both directions get charged the same amounts?
- Advertising-funded mobile connectivity has been tried multiple times, and has multiple problems. In particular, you can’t insert ads into most apps, and use of encryption/privacy tools like VPNs mean that cookies in mobile browsers may not work properly forever.
There’s probably another 20–100 similar “gotchas” out there, applying to some or all of the token concepts. Part of my work is trying to predict these types of problem before they arise, and have an idea of how tractable they are, and what workaround might exist. If you’re an innovator in this space, or an investor, and want someone to cast a critical eye over a project, get in touch. (information AT disruptive-analysis DOT com, or on LinkedIn)
Ironically one area that’s almost certainly overestimated as a problem is anything to do with Net Neutrality, though. I’ve covered various examples of such nonsense in prior posts, such as this one (link).
It should be noted that many of these tokens are thinly-traded, or even unlisted on any major cryptocurrency exchanges. Some are pre-ICO / private-funding. Please note that I offer no recommendations on investing in anything, especially cryptocurrencies. Do your own research and use extreme caution if you’re tempted.
The tokenisation of telecoms and networks is evolving rapidly. It’s genuinely fascinating, as are the potential uses of private/permissioned blockchains inside telcos. However, anyone expecting decentralisation to change the networking world in 2018 (or 2019) is going to be disappointed.
There’s lots of enthusiasm, but many roadblocks in the way. Many of the concepts are likely to prove unworkable — and while some projects may raise enough funds through ICOs or private investors to allow them to pivot, others will likely fail. If you’re speculating in the short term, that might not matter. But be aware that harsh realities will come along with the new opportunities.
Please get in touch if you’d like to get deeper analysis, or if you’re looking for advisory input as a project team or investor (although I’m not able to give investment recommendations).
Originally published at disruptivewireless.blogspot.com on January 9, 2018.